Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • G gitlabhq1
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 21
    • Issues 21
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 12
    • Merge requests 12
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • gpt
  • large_projects
  • gitlabhq1
  • Issues
  • #8613

Closed
Open
Created Jan 19, 2015 by Administrator@rootOwner

Parts of a code block mistakenly treated as issue mentions

Created by: bchretien

I noticed that after copying a gdb backtrace inside a code block to a comment as follows:

Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
0x00007ffff6109895 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libcuda.so
(cuda-gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff6109895 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libcuda.so
#1 0x00007ffff610b309 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libcuda.so
#2 0x00007ffff610c832 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libcuda.so
#3 0x00007ffff60a958c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libcuda.so
#4 0x00007ffff609fb8e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libcuda.so
#5 0x00007ffff5f4364f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libcuda.so
#6 0x00007ffff5ff8829 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libcuda.so
#7 0x00007ffff7b97976 in ?? () from /opt/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.5.0
#8 0x00007ffff7b9cbe0 in ?? () from /opt/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.5.0
#9 0x00007ffff7b9545b in ?? () from /opt/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.5.0
#10 0x00007ffff7b9e4ac in ?? () from /opt/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.5.0
#11 0x00007ffff7ba1ffa in ?? () from /opt/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.5.0
#12 0x00007ffff7b9b323 in ?? () from /opt/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.5.0
#13 0x00007ffff7b8b759 in ?? () from /opt/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.5.0
#14 0x00007ffff7bb0f2a in cudaMalloc () from /opt/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.5.0
#15 0x000000000040093f in main () at texture.cu:14

The issue where this comment was made is now referenced in issues 1 to 15 (mentioned in issue #...). I guess that code blocks should be ignored when checking for such references.

This was observed with GitLab 7.4.2 (477743a), so it may have been fixed since then, but I haven't been able to find any mentions on this bug in the issue tracker (looking up "issue", "mention", "reference" and so on makes it hard to find relevant issues).

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking