Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • G gitlabhq1
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 21
    • Issues 21
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 12
    • Merge requests 12
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • gpt
  • large_projects
  • gitlabhq1
  • Issues
  • #8808

Closed
Open
Created Feb 16, 2015 by Administrator@rootOwner

Gitlab Issue Management: Project vs. Team Management

Created by: oscx

We appreciate all the simplifications (in a positive way) and advantage of gitlab's issue management.

Regarding project and (large) team management, the team "leader" has some limitation. He only can check each team member's tasks per project and doesn't have one overall overview per user.

E.g. for checking the current tasks with a team size of 10 members and 50 projects, it's necessary to step in each single project, e.g. for checking the current tasks and load of team team members, the "master" is required to check 50 projects, one-by-one to find out the 10 people's current tasks in progress/queue/completed which is pretty inefficient.

That's why we currently workaround with a very ugly DB query to get a full list of tasks, sorted by team memers, building the deeplink to the issues in sql, appending labels for priority in the sql output.

This works for short-term and saves us lots of time. (as long as alternative is checking 50 projects manually)

Is there another approach or implementation which allows cross-user overviews at least for admins?

Btw. I think that that's still one of the reasons why some teams prefer jira/redmine integration in gitlab although gitlab's own issue management is very advanced, too. only missing few powerful and necessary features like the project and team manager overview...

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking