Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
    • Projects Groups Snippets
      Help
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • G gitlabhq1
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 21
    • Issues 21
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 12
    • Merge requests 12
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • gpt
  • large_projects
  • gitlabhq1
  • Merge requests
  • !3647

Closed
Created 12 years ago by Administrator@rootOwner
  • Report abuse
Report abuse

Attempt at #3022 - More complex implementation

  • Overview 2
  • Commits 4
  • Changes 2

Created by: brocktimus

As per #3022 (closed) I'm trying to add procs to the gitlab configuration that adjust how LDAP attributes are mapped to users. There are two implementations and pull requests because I'm unsure which is better and I should go down the route of writing tests for. The other pull request is #3646.

In this implementation I thought the create from omniauth function was getting somewhat complex. Tried to pull some of the more complex stuff out into its own helper class as can be seen. Quite a bit of code removed and then a "large" class added to try and simplify code and interface.

Unsure if it is better or not, hence creating the other implementation with less changes.

/cc @senny

Loading
Loading

  • Administrator
    Administrator @root · 12 years ago
    Owner

    Created by: coveralls

    Coverage Status

    Coverage remained the same when pulling 7ccba13f on brocktimus:more_procs into 4524f00a on gitlabhq:master.

    By Administrator on 2013-04-20T09:21:11 (imported from GitLab project)

  • Administrator
    Administrator @root · 12 years ago
    Owner

    Created by: senny

    Lets focus on #3646. I'm closing this one as we can always reopen if we reconsider.

    Thanks for your work ❤

    By Administrator on 2013-04-20T10:11:54 (imported from GitLab project)

  • You're only seeing other activity in the feed. To add a comment, switch to one of the following options.
Please register or sign in to reply
0 Assignees
None
Assign to
0 Reviewers
None
Request review from
Milestone
No milestone
None
None
Time tracking
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • No matching results
  • Manage project labels
Lock merge request
Unlocked
participants
Reference:
Source branch: github/fork/brocktimus/more_procs

    0 pending comments

Menu

Projects Groups Snippets
Help